WEKO3
アイテム
Formulaicity of Language: Its Pervasiveness and the Processing Advantage in Language Use
https://doi.org/10.34356/00000279
https://doi.org/10.34356/0000027951e9110d-0721-48eb-a114-21afcdcdab61
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
Formulaicity of Language: Its Pervasiveness and the Processing Advantage in Language Use (83.8 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2012-03-23 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | Formulaicity of Language: Its Pervasiveness and the Processing Advantage in Language Use | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.34356/00000279 | |||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||
| 著者 |
奥脇, 奈津美
× 奥脇, 奈津美
× OKUWAKI, Natsumi
|
|||||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | Language makes extensive use of formulaic sequences, such as in other words or as soon as, which are typically described as multiword expressions that are stored, retrieved and processed as a single lexical unit. It is now widely acknowledged that the appropriate use of formulae and collocation is a prerequisite for proficient language use (Sinclair, 1991; Wray, 2002). Accumulating research shows that a word in a formulaic sequence is processed faster than the same word in a non-formulaic sequence, suggesting that there is a processing advantage for formulaic language use. It is yet to be known, however, if there is a psychological validity of formulaic sequences in the human mind, as the studies do not demonstrate clear-cut results (Schmitt, Grandage & Adolphos, 2004; Schmitt & Underwood, 2004; Underwood, Schmitt & Galpin, 2004; Jiang & Nekrasova, 2007; Conklin & Schmitt, 2008). In the research of second language (L2) acquisition, language learners are often reported to have problems with these multiword expressions (Howarth, 1998; Nesselhauf, 2003; among others), leading me to suggest that the intervention of language teaching should play a crucial part in the development of these properties. Considering the relationship between formulaicity and creativity of language, I conclude by proposing that a model which could accommodate both idiomaticity and novelty of human language at the same level would be necessary for the development of L2 research. | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 都留文科大学 | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
都留文科大学研究紀要 en : 都留文科大学研究紀要 号 75, p. 1-11, 発行日 2012-03-20 |
|||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 0286-3774 | |||||||||
| NCID | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00149431 | |||||||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
